Verdicts & Settlements

Verdict for patient in claim for perforated bowel

Gary M. went to the hospital Emergency Room in the middle of the night because he could not urinate. The urologist on call initially told the ER Doctors to send Gary home to take a warm bath. Gary returned to the ER in severe pain because he could not empty his bladder. This time the on call urologist did come into the hospital and while trying to inspect Gary’s bladder with a rigid urethroscope punctured through Gary’s urethra and his bowel. Gary had to wear a colostomy bag for 5 months to give his bowel time to heal. Tim Gallagher prepared and took the case to trial and a jury in the City of St. Louis returned a verdict in favor of Gary awarding him his medical bills, lost wages and $125,000.00 for non-economic damages.

What Our Clients Say

"There are three people you need to feel comfortable with. You need to feel comfortable with your doctor. You need to feel comfortable with your Pastor. And you definitely need to feel comfortable with your attorney. If you need to chase after any one of those people there is a problem. But that was not the case with Jennifer. She was personal, and even more, she was professional. I was always informed of what was going on in my case, and of what the next step was. I was referred to Jennifer by another attorney that could not help me with the specialized case, but now Jennifer is my “go to” attorney. I could not have been happier with her and her firm."

– Edward

Noteworthy Cases

Case that reversed 150 years of legal precedence – As a young lawyer, Tim Gallagher, defended a cardiologist in the St. Louis area who admitted to having an affair with one of his patients. The husband of the patient sued the doctor for alienation of affections and criminal conversation. The case went to trial in December, 1992 after the Doctor had left the country to return to his native Pakistan. At trial Tim convinced the jury that his client was not responsible for alienating the affections of the wife, but the jury found for the husband on his claim for criminal conversation and awarded one dollar in damages. Criminal conversation is an ancient claim for damages that could be asserted by a husband for the trespass on his wife’s body against any one who had sexual intercourse with her.

Initially the husband appealed his loss on the alienation of affections claim to the Missouri Court of Appeals. On behalf of his client Tim cross - appealed the $1 verdict for the husband and convinced the Missouri Supreme Court to invoke a seldom used rule to hear the case for the purpose of reexamining the existing law before an opinion of the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court agreed with Tim’s position and changed the law in the State of Missouri. ­Thomas v. Siddiqui, 869 S.W.2d 740 (Mo. 1994)

Largest personal injury verdict in Saint Charles County History – Unfortunately this verdict came when Tim Gallagher was representing the defendant. Tim represented a local Fraternity at Southwest Missouri State University in a claim bought by a young lady who was a guest at their spring dance. Following the dance the young lady dove into the shallow end of a pool and sustained a catastrophic injury that left her a quadriplegic. She claimed that the members of the fraternity served her beer in violation of the National Fraternity’s policies. The jury agreed and awarded the plaintiff $7.65 Million in actual and punitive damages. Tim represented the local chapter of the fraternity through the appeal, and following a successful oral argument the case was settled for $200,000, which was the amount Tim offered before trial. Though the amount of the verdict was not collected, it is believed to be largest personal injury verdict in the history of Saint Charles County.

Case that improved the rights of workers to achieve fair compensation – Smith v. Climate Engineering, 939 S.W.2d 429 (Mo. E.D. 1996) Charles Smith, who was 61 years at the time of the hearing, worked in the sheet metal industry for approximately forty years as a sheet metal worker and a foreman. Mr. Smith was represented by Sally I. Heller. The Missouri Labor and Industrial Commission awarded Mr. Smith medical expenses and ordered to pay for additional medical treatment because Mr. Smith sustained an injury due to performing his usual and customary duties which lead to a physical breakdown or change in pathology. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling and further found that the repetitive trauma Mr. Smith experienced while flexing and extending his neck as part of his job constituted a compensable injury which was unforeseen or unexpected, arose out of and in the course of employment and was clearly job related.

Jones v. Washington University, 199 S.W. 3d 793 (Mo. App. E.D. 2006) Jeanette Jones, worked as a nurse at Washington University and was sexually assaulted by a patient suffering from severe psychological injuries and disability. The Missouri Court of Appeals ruled that the Missouri Labor and Industrial Commission applied the incorrect section of Chapter 287 which was 287.120.8 and instead, should have applied section 287.120.1 to determine whether Ms. Jones sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of her employment. The case is still pending before the Missouri Court of Appeals.